In my autoexec.cfg I have this line,
logfile startup.txt
While GZDoom creates a logfile startup.txt, which includes the Date and Time in the file, ie:
Log started: Wed Nov 04 09:35:40 2009
it overwrites the old file with a new one every time that GZDoom is started.
Could it be done a la Skulltag, which adds the Date and Time to the logfile name, ie:
startup.txt__2009_11_04-10_40_02.log
and thusly creates a next logfile every time, leaving the old file(s) intact ?
			
			
									
						
										
						+logfile
Moderator: Graf Zahl
- 
				Enjay
														 - Developer

 - Posts: 4759
 - Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 23:19
 - Location: Scotland
 
Re: +logfile
Oh dear lord please no!  I'm sick of hundreds of files piling up on my HD because of Skulltag doing that without (as far as I can tell) an option to switch off log files.  It also dumps them in my root directory which I really don't like.
I too usually start GZdoom with a logfile but I'm absolutely fine with it over-writing the previous one.
I suppose a compromise would be to allow a naming system but include some kind of limit to the number of files GZdoom writes?
			
			
									
						
										
						I too usually start GZdoom with a logfile but I'm absolutely fine with it over-writing the previous one.
I suppose a compromise would be to allow a naming system but include some kind of limit to the number of files GZdoom writes?
- 
				Sussudio
 - Posts: 98
 - Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 21:49
 
Re: +logfile
It should be optional of course, for testing purposes.
			
			
									
						
										
						- 
				Enjay
														 - Developer

 - Posts: 4759
 - Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 23:19
 - Location: Scotland
 
Re: +logfile
+logfile is already optional (which is more than the SkullTag version seems to be 
 ).  Perhaps some kind of setting to allow multiple (renamed) logfiles or something?
			
			
									
						
										
						- 
				Sussudio
 - Posts: 98
 - Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 21:49
 
Re: +logfile
Yep, that's what I was talking about.
			
			
									
						
										
						- 
				NeoHippo
														 - Posts: 408
 - Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 0:47
 - Location: British Columbia Canada
 
Re: +logfile
Maybe ten would be enough to satisfy even a rigorous testing session.Enjay wrote:I suppose a compromise would be to allow a naming system but include some kind of limit to the number of files GZdoom writes?
- 
				Gez
														 - Developer

 - Posts: 1399
 - Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 16:47
 
Re: +logfile
Keep logfile working as it does now. Please.
However, I'd be okay with a new, different, separate command that would work like Skulltag does. Let's say "dlogfile", with a "d" for "dated".
This way everybody should be happy, both those who want to keep all logs and those who want to have it constantly overwritten.
			
			
									
						
										
						However, I'd be okay with a new, different, separate command that would work like Skulltag does. Let's say "dlogfile", with a "d" for "dated".
This way everybody should be happy, both those who want to keep all logs and those who want to have it constantly overwritten.
- 
				Graf Zahl
														 - GZDoom Developer

 - Posts: 7148
 - Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:48
 - Location: Germany
 
Re: +logfile
Wow, some people surely can't be bothered to think for even a second, can they?
Request denied.
			
			
									
						
										
						Request denied.